nanog mailing list archives
Re: Even the New York Times withholds the address
From: Michael.Dillon () radianz com
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 11:05:45 +0000
It'd be cheaper to move the entire carrier hotel to the "safe" area and forget having offsite power.
Exactly! If you are going to solve the redundant services problem (power and cooling) with some kind of regional power and cooling network, then it makes sense to cluster the various organizations who need these services in the same area. Therefore, we should be thinking about how we can move carrier hotels to be near major hospitals. And if you think that clustering defeats the idea of distributing your assets, I am not suggesting that there should be only one cluster in a metropolitan area. Just as there are several major hospitals, there should be several carrier hotels. -- Michael Dillon
Current thread:
- Re: Even the New York Times withholds the address, (continued)
- Re: Even the New York Times withholds the address Daniel Senie (Nov 19)
- Re: Even the New York Times withholds the address Charles Sprickman (Nov 19)
- Re: Even the New York Times withholds the address Allan Liska (Nov 19)
- Re: Even the New York Times withholds the address Michael . Dillon (Nov 19)
- RE: Even the New York Times withholds the address Deepak Jain (Nov 19)
- RE: Even the New York Times withholds the address Mikael Abrahamsson (Nov 19)
- RE: Even the New York Times withholds the address Deepak Jain (Nov 19)
- RE: Even the New York Times withholds the address Deepak Jain (Nov 19)
- RE: Even the New York Times withholds the address Jurbala, Daryl (Nov 19)
- Re: Even the New York Times withholds the address blitz (Nov 19)
- Re: Even the New York Times withholds the address Stephen Sprunk (Nov 19)
- Re: Even the New York Times withholds the address Michael . Dillon (Nov 20)