nanog mailing list archives
Re: Even the New York Times withholds the address
From: Jim Segrave <jes () nl demon net>
Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2002 13:26:13 +0100
On Tue 19 Nov 2002 (07:12 -0500), Johannes Ullrich wrote:
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/19/nyregion/19FUEL.html...While almost everyone on this list knows which building is the subject of the article, we can discuss the issue without discussing the particular building. On-site fuel storage is one of those double-edge swords.The article is comparing the relatively 'inert' diesel fuel to the aircraft fuel that caused the devastation at the WTC. Did the authors of this article ever hear about heating oil tanks?
I suggest you have a closer look at what aviation fuel actually is. -- Jim Segrave jes () nl demon net
Current thread:
- Even the New York Times withholds the address Sean Donelan (Nov 18)
- Re: Even the New York Times withholds the address Johannes Ullrich (Nov 19)
- Re: Even the New York Times withholds the address Jim Segrave (Nov 19)
- Re: Even the New York Times withholds the address Joel Jaeggli (Nov 19)
- Re: Even the New York Times withholds the address bmanning (Nov 19)
- Re: Even the New York Times withholds the address Johannes Ullrich (Nov 19)
- Re: Even the New York Times withholds the address alex (Nov 19)
- Re: Even the New York Times withholds the address Brett Frankenberger (Nov 19)
- Re: Even the New York Times withholds the address Johannes Ullrich (Nov 19)
- Re: Even the New York Times withholds the address blitz (Nov 19)
- Re: Even the New York Times withholds the address David Howe (Nov 19)
- Re: Even the New York Times withholds the address Richard Irving (Nov 19)
- Re: Even the New York Times withholds the address Alex Rubenstein (Nov 19)
- Re: Even the New York Times withholds the address Johannes Ullrich (Nov 19)