nanog mailing list archives
Re: PAIX
From: "Stephen Sprunk" <ssprunk () cisco com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:21:48 -0600
Thus spake <fkittred () gwi net>
On Thu, 14 Nov 2002 10:22:09 -0500 David Diaz wrote:2) There is a lack of a killer app requiring peering every 100 sq Km.David; I recommend some quality time with journals covering South Korea, broadband, online gaming and video rental.
Current peering levels suggest that it is cheaper to haul the traffic to a dozen or so points than it is to manage peering at several hundred points. Wasting bandwidth is a lot cheaper than wasting humans. S
Current thread:
- Re: PAIX, (continued)
- Re: PAIX E.B. Dreger (Nov 14)
- Re: PAIX David Diaz (Nov 14)
- Re: PAIX fkittred (Nov 14)
- Re: PAIX Stephen Sprunk (Nov 14)
- Re: PAIX Pete Kruckenberg (Nov 14)
- Re: PAIX David Diaz (Nov 14)
- Re: PAIX fkittred (Nov 15)
- Re: PAIX David Diaz (Nov 15)
- Re: PAIX fkittred (Nov 15)
- Re: PAIX Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 15)
- Re: PAIX fkittred (Nov 15)
- Re: PAIX Richard Irving (Nov 15)
- Re: PAIX fkittred (Nov 15)
- Re: PAIX Richard Irving (Nov 15)