nanog mailing list archives
Re: Large ISPs doing NAT?
From: Joe Abley <jabley () automagic org>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 00:43:20 -0400
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, at 10:33 , Steven J. Sobol wrote:
On Wed, 1 May 2002, Deepak Jain wrote:I'm more concerned that if the major metropolitan markets deploying GPRSall use NAT, then the Next Big Thing won't ever happen on GPRS devices. Customers won't jump ship if they have no where to jump to.The only people who'd be deploying GPRS are GSM cellular providers, no?
The concern exists regardless of the specifics of the always-on, cellular packet radio protocols being used, surely?
[GSM coverage is patchy in the US]
It's prevalent elsewhere. I'd be surprised if there aren't more GSM subscribers in the world than non-GSM subscribers.
Joe
Current thread:
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? mike harrison (Apr 30)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Eliot Lear (May 01)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis (May 01)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Peter Bierman (May 01)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Roland Dobbins (May 01)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Michael Painter (May 01)
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Deepak Jain (May 01)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Eliot Lear (May 01)
- RE: Large ISPs doing NAT? Steven J. Sobol (May 01)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Joe Abley (May 01)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Steven J. Sobol (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? michael thomas guldan (May 03)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Steven J. Sobol (May 04)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis (May 01)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Eliot Lear (May 01)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Jake Khuon (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Steven J. Sobol (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Peter Bierman (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Scott Francis (May 02)
- Re: Large ISPs doing NAT? Peter Bierman (May 02)