Re: ratios

["Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve () opaltelecom co uk>]

> It's a great big catch-22 any way you look at it, and I hate you, Peter
> Jansen, for it.  There's a special level of hell for people like you when
> you die.

a little harsh ;)



> Dean
>
> > Regards
> >
> > Peter Jansen
> > Global Peering
> > Cable & Wireless
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 13:30 -0400 (EDT)
> > From: Scott Granados <scott () graphidelix net>
> > To: nanog () merit edu
> > Sender: owner-nanog () merit edu
> > Delivered-to: nanog-outgoing () trapdoor merit edu
> > Delivered-to: nanog () trapdoor merit edu
> > Delivered-to: nanog () merit edu
> > Subject: ratios
> >
> >
> > I'm not overly familiar with this but I wondered if someone could detail
> > for me the basics of using ratios to determine elegibility to peer?   I
> > have heard that some carrers especially the largest require a specific
> > ratio is this in fact true and is the logic as simple as just insuring
> > equal use of the peer?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Scott
>
>
> _____________________________________________
> Free email with personality! Over 200 domains!
> http://www.MyOwnEmail.com