nanog mailing list archives
Re: uRPF Loose Check Mode vs. ACL
From: Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>
Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 01:43:39 -0400
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 12:50:53AM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu wrote:
On Sun, 05 May 2002 22:11:12 EDT, Richard A Steenbergen said:What we all really need is a protocol which can distribute filtering information network-wide. Go make one. :)No, what we need is a protocol that can do *secured* distribution of filtering info net-wide. Otherwise, some bozo is going to accidentally inject a flter for 127/8, causing as much fun as the announcement of same a few years ago. And I'm *sure* there's at least a few people on this list that would be *very* tempted to inject filters for RFC1918 space for the benefit of those providers that don't egress filter it currently ;)
Nononono, by network-wide I ment *MY* network not the Internet. :) Though I really wouldn't mind seeing a well known community for "nexthop null0". How can people sit around pontificating on useless features for useless protocols all day long, and yet not do this? BTW, I don't know what announcing 127/8 would break since that should never leave or enter any systems, and I still take issue with the need to filter 1918 packets. -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
Current thread:
- Re: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks?, (continued)
- Re: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks? Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 05)
- RE: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks? Barry Raveendran Greene (May 05)
- unicast RPF for peers viable? Iljitsch van Beijnum (May 05)
- Re: unicast RPF for peers viable? Richard A Steenbergen (May 05)
- RE: unicast RPF for peers viable? Barry Raveendran Greene (May 05)
- uRPF Loose Check Mode vs. ACL Livio Ricciulli (May 05)
- Re: uRPF Loose Check Mode vs. ACL Richard A Steenbergen (May 05)
- Re: uRPF Loose Check Mode vs. ACL Livio Ricciulli (May 05)
- Re: uRPF Loose Check Mode vs. ACL Richard A Steenbergen (May 05)
- Re: uRPF Loose Check Mode vs. ACL Valdis . Kletnieks (May 05)
- Re: uRPF Loose Check Mode vs. ACL Richard A Steenbergen (May 05)
- Re: unicast RPF for peers viable? Stephen Griffin (May 05)
- Re: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks? Stephen Griffin (May 05)
- Re: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks? Christopher L. Morrow (May 05)
- Re: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks? Stephen Griffin (May 05)
- Re: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks? Christopher L. Morrow (May 05)
- Re: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks? Richard A Steenbergen (May 05)
- Re: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks? Steven W. Raymond (May 06)
- Re: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks? Ralph Doncaster (May 06)
- Re: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks? Valdis . Kletnieks (May 06)
- Re: Effective ways to deal with DDoS attacks? Ralph Doncaster (May 06)