nanog mailing list archives
Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering
From: Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 19:58:40 -0500
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 07:31:52PM -0500, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
Are we talking AS_Path attributes here? If so, all this means is that now we don't announce OTHER BACKBONE routes to C&W/EXODUS, which we probably weren't doing anyway.Actually, it also mean a reduction in the possible paths presented to my router for computation. Some would say this is a good thing. Me, I like having multiple choices / redundancy. Better to have two ways to get to EXDS than one. IMHO, of course.
In my experience, the odds of any given path sucking are far greater than the odds of that path going away. Therefore I would rather have one path which doesn't suck than two paths which may. -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
Current thread:
- RE: Exodus/C&W Depeering, (continued)
- RE: Exodus/C&W Depeering Sean M. Doran (Mar 26)
- RE: Exodus/C&W Depeering Hank Nussbacher (Mar 26)
- RE: Exodus/C&W Depeering Chris Parker (Mar 26)
- RE: Exodus/C&W Depeering Bill Woodcock (Mar 26)
- RE: Exodus/C&W Depeering Vadim Antonov (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Peter Galbavy (Mar 28)
- RE: Exodus/C&W Depeering Hank Nussbacher (Mar 26)
- RE: Exodus/C&W Depeering Sean M. Doran (Mar 26)
- RE: Exodus/C&W Depeering Sean M. Doran (Mar 26)
- RE: Exodus/C&W Depeering Stephen J. Wilcox (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Sean M. Doran (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering E.B. Dreger (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 26)
- Re: Exodus/C&W Depeering Patrick W. Gilmore (Mar 26)
- RE: Exodus/C&W Depeering alex (Mar 26)