nanog
mailing list archives
[no subject]
I am assuming that the reasons it's not happening like this are much more political
than technical.
-C
On Tue, Mar 26, 2002 at 10:18:04AM -0800, Bill Woodcock wrote:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
> You mean Exodus are well connected and C&W limit themselves which gives
> longer paths and increased latency.
Longer paths definitely, increased jitter probably, increased latency
probably, increased loss possibly.
C&W obviously have to have a lot of peering as well, since it's all they
have to sell to their customers. However, their peering tends to be
limited to a small number of peers to whom they have large connections,
whereas Exodus had a large number of peers to whom they had medium-sized
connections. So the average hop-count and as-path length for the Internet
as a whole are both increased by this action, and nearly all paths
increase in length for Exodus customers. So yes, Exodus customers are the
big losers in the wake of this.
-Bill
Current thread:
- [no subject] Unknown (Feb 04)