nanog mailing list archives
Re: 1024-bit RSA keys in danger of compromise (fwd)
From: Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 23:21:29 -0500
On Mon, Mar 25, 2002 at 11:05:21PM -0500, Deepak Jain wrote:
That is a falicy. Moore's law is most certainly not accelerating -- in fact: 1965-1990 Moore's law stated that the number of transistors per square inch on integrated circuits (and therefore, the speed) doubles every 2 years. The pace has since slowed down a bit, but appears to be holding steady at doubling every 18 months (1995-present).
Not to be too picky, but how is going from "doubling every 2 years" to "doubling every 18 months" slowing down? :) -- Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras PGP Key ID: 0x138EA177 (67 29 D7 BC E8 18 3E DA B2 46 B3 D8 14 36 FE B6)
Current thread:
- Re: 1024-bit RSA keys in danger of compromise (fwd), (continued)
- Re: 1024-bit RSA keys in danger of compromise (fwd) Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 25)
- RE: 1024-bit RSA keys in danger of compromise (fwd) Deepak Jain (Mar 25)
- RE: 1024-bit RSA keys in danger of compromise (fwd) Len Sassaman (Mar 25)
- RE: 1024-bit RSA keys in danger of compromise (fwd) Deepak Jain (Mar 25)
- RE: 1024-bit RSA keys in danger of compromise (fwd) Len Sassaman (Mar 25)
- Re: 1024-bit RSA keys in danger of compromise (fwd) Brad Barnett (Mar 25)
- Re: 1024-bit RSA keys in danger of compromise (fwd) David Shaw (Mar 25)
- RE: 1024-bit RSA keys in danger of compromise (fwd) Deepak Jain (Mar 25)
- RE: 1024-bit RSA keys in danger of compromise (fwd) Len Sassaman (Mar 25)
- RE: 1024-bit RSA keys in danger of compromise (fwd) Deepak Jain (Mar 25)
- Re: 1024-bit RSA keys in danger of compromise (fwd) Richard A Steenbergen (Mar 25)
- Re: 1024-bit RSA keys in danger of compromise (fwd) Len Sassaman (Mar 25)