nanog mailing list archives

Re: Tauzin-Dingell (was ICANN)


From: Mike Joseph <mjoseph () netaxs com>
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2002 17:35:02 -0500 (EST)


On Tue, 5 Mar 2002, Richard A Steenbergen wrote:

On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 03:21:06PM -0500, William Allen Simpson wrote:

[...] much ranting deleted

http://www.rivers4congress.com/

Am I the only one who is uncomfortable with turning NANOG into a political 
tirade? Opposing legislation is one thing, turning it into an opportunity 
to elect your favorite candidate is another.

I agree.  I think that NANOG is in no way the appropriate forum for
discussion of a particular candidate.  I do, however, feel that those in
our industry need to be more politically active, especially with regard to
legislation such as this.  In fact, Mr. Simpson may have a good idea about
the formation of ISP political lobby, but NANOG shouldn't be it.

-Mike


Current thread: