Re: PBNAPs renumbering 6-Mar-02 (was: more info on SBC/Nap)

[Aditya <aditya () mighty grot org>]

I assume the switch happened? In any case, there are no DNS servers listed for
the in-addr records of these two blocks; is this by design?

Adi

On Thu, Feb 14, 2002 at 01:08:37PM -0500, renster wrote:
> Thanks Bill!
>
> Just one clarification - participants were told this would happen on 
> 6-March.
>
> From the note sent out to participants on Monday:
> PBNAP-SF - 198.32.128.x will become: 206.223.120.x
> PBNAP-LA - 198.32.129.x will become: 206.223.121.x
>
> If you are a participant and didn't get a copy of the note with dial-in 
> number for the maint. window drop me a line and I'll put you in touch with 
> the folks at the NAP.
>
> Cheers,
> -ren
>
> At 06:21 PM 2/14/2002 +0000, bmanning () karoshi com wrote:
>
>
> > I've just been told that SBC/PacBell is in process of renumbering
> > the PacBell exchanges in Oakland and LA.  So you should not see
> > either 198.32.128.0 or 198.32.129.0 in your traceroutes or from
> > your peers as of 28 feb 2002.
> >
> > --bill