nanog mailing list archives

Sprint peering policy

From: Ralph Doncaster <ralph () istop com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 13:33:14 -0400 (EDT)


Someone was kind enough to forward me an outline of the peering policy
they received from Sprint.  It seems to be the toughest one I've seen -

=OC48 in 14 US cities, >=OC12 to Europe.  To find out the traffic

minimums and ratios it looks like an NDA is required...

Ralph Doncaster
principal, IStop.com

Current thread:

RE: Sprint peering policy Mitchell, Dan (Jun 26)
- RE: Sprint peering policy alex (Jun 26)
  - Re: Sprint peering policy Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Sprint peering policy Ralph Doncaster (Jun 26)
  - Re: Sprint peering policy Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 26)
    - Re: Sprint peering policy Richard Irving (Jun 26)
  - Re: Sprint peering policy Majdi S. Abbas (Jun 26)
    - Re: Sprint peering policy Jeff Nelson (Jun 26)
  - Re: Sprint peering policy Jeff Aitken (Jun 26)
    - Re: Sprint peering policy Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 26)
- Sprint peering policy Ralph Doncaster (Jun 26)
  - RE: Sprint peering policy Daniel Golding (Jun 27)
    - RE: Sprint peering policy Ralph Doncaster (Jun 27)
    - RE: Sprint peering policy E.B. Dreger (Jun 27)
    - RE: Sprint peering policy Ralph Doncaster (Jun 27)
    - RE: Sprint peering policy E.B. Dreger (Jun 27)
    - RE: Sprint peering policy Alex Rubenstein (Jun 27)
    - RE: Sprint peering policy E.B. Dreger (Jun 27)
    - RE: Sprint peering policy Joe Wood (Jun 27)
    - Message not available
    - RE: Sprint peering policy Patrick W. Gilmore (Jun 27)
    - RE: Sprint peering policy Ralph Doncaster (Jun 27)

(Thread continues...)