nanog mailing list archives
Re: Bogon list
From: "Miquel van Smoorenburg" <miquels () cistron nl>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2002 15:29:52 +0000 (UTC)
In article <cistron.20020605144803.GB12164 () overlord e-gerbil net>, Richard A Steenbergen <ras () e-gerbil net> wrote:
On Wed, Jun 05, 2002 at 08:34:58AM +0000, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote:I haven't seen a 'icmp source lo0' interface command yet. Hopefully it will be added for ipv6 so exchanges can use link-local addressing (ipv6 has no fragmentation, PMTUd is mandatory).I'm not terribly sure why you would want to make traceroutes lose all information about the circuits you're traveling through. It would make diagnostics an everloving nightmare, IMHO.
With link-local addressing and ip verify unicast reverse you're not going to see any TTL exceeded traceroute packets from link-local addresses anyway. And no ICMP size exceeded packets either, which was my point. But indeed it should be 'ip icmp type <TYPE> source <IP|INT>', with at least a default 'ip icmp type 4 source lo0' or similar for interfaces with link-local addressing. Mike.
Current thread:
- Re: OT: Re: Bogon list, (continued)
- Re: OT: Re: Bogon list Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 05)
- Common Sense W.D.McKinney (Jun 05)
- Re: OT: Re: Bogon list Rafi Sadowsky (Jun 05)
- Re: OT: Re: Bogon list Scott Francis (Jun 06)
- Re: OT: Re: Bogon list Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 05)
- Re: OT: Re: Bogon list Greg A. Woods (Jun 06)
- net.inet.icmp.sourceforce (Re: Bogon list) E.B. Dreger (Jun 05)
- Re: Bogon list bmanning (Jun 05)
- Re: Bogon list Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 05)