nanog mailing list archives
Re: Supporting White Hats (Was SPEWS)
From: JC Dill <nanog () vo cnchost com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 13:59:58 -0700
On 06:45 PM 6/20/02, measl () mfn org wrote: > I work goddamn >hard keeping my corner crispy white, but the crispy whites are invisible when >it comes to sales time.Perhaps you should help the sales department position this important data in their marketing literature and sales pitches. Tout the advantages of doing business with a crispy white hat, how it improves the reliability of one's Internet connection and services, etc. You can't blame the Internet community for not knowing about your "secret efforts" to stay crispy white if you keep those efforts secret!
jc (posted and emailed)
Current thread:
- Re: e-mail blacklists (was Re: SPEWS?), (continued)
- Re: e-mail blacklists (was Re: SPEWS?) jlewis (Jun 20)
- Re: e-mail blacklists (was Re: SPEWS?) Martin Hannigan (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? John Payne (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Simon Lyall (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Greg A. Woods (Jun 21)
- Re: SPEWS? JC Dill (Jun 21)
- Re: SPEWS? up (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- Re[2]: SPEWS? Richard Welty (Jun 20)
- Supporting White Hats (Was SPEWS) measl (Jun 20)
- Re: Supporting White Hats (Was SPEWS) JC Dill (Jun 21)
- Re: Supporting White Hats (Was SPEWS) measl (Jun 21)
- Re: SPEWS? Måns Nilsson (Jun 21)
- Re: Fw: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? David Charlap (Jun 20)