nanog mailing list archives
Null Routing Spews (Re: SPEWS?)
From: Drew Linsalata <drew () gothambus com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 08:55:06 -0400
if SPEWS behavior is abusive towards a network, that network does have a limited recourse: null-route SPEWS.
Looks like at least one person recently has had the same idea: http://www.anti-spews.org Seems like a tough road to hoe. By null routing entire netblocks associated with SPEWS, I'd guess that the folks providing bandwidth, DNS, etc. for SPEWS would be more likely to cave to the pressure long before the SPEWS admins themselves. The thing that comes to mind for me is that null routing might present all kinds of legal issues, but at least those might force SPEWS out of hiding to address them. Who knows? - Drew
Current thread:
- Re: SPEWS?, (continued)
- Re: SPEWS? Dan Hollis (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- chinanet cleanup? blitz (Jun 21)
- Re: SPEWS? william (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Chrisy Luke (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Valdis . Kletnieks (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? william (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Dave Israel (Jun 20)
- Null Routing Spews (Re: SPEWS?) Drew Linsalata (Jun 21)
- Re: SPEWS? Steven J. Sobol (Jun 20)
- RE: SPEWS? Geo. (Jun 20)
- RE: SPEWS? Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? John Payne (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? Geo. (Jun 20)
- e-mail blacklists (was Re: SPEWS?) J.D. Falk (Jun 20)
- Re: e-mail blacklists (was Re: SPEWS?) measl (Jun 20)
- Re: e-mail blacklists (was Re: SPEWS?) jlewis (Jun 20)
- Re: e-mail blacklists (was Re: SPEWS?) Martin Hannigan (Jun 20)
- Re: SPEWS? John Payne (Jun 20)