nanog mailing list archives
Re: Bandwidth Monitoring by IP
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja () darkwing uoregon edu>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2002 08:34:58 -0700 (PDT)
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Mitchell, Dan wrote:
Hi all, Does anyone know of a low-cost solution for monitoring bandwidth by IP? My original thought was 1 switch port = 1 IP, but in the case of virtual IP's on a single port, that just wouldn't work. I'm seeing more and more of a
virtual ip's == nats? all ip addresses are real ip addresses.
demand for a basic BW report by IP, so our customers can bill their customer accordingly. Any recommendations? Thanks, Dan Dan Mitchell Internet Systems Engineer - Boston AllegianceInternet / Hosting.com 781.478.1857 Direct Line dan.mitchell () hosting com
-- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Joel Jaeggli Academic User Services joelja () darkwing uoregon edu -- PGP Key Fingerprint: 1DE9 8FCA 51FB 4195 B42A 9C32 A30D 121E -- In Dr. Johnson's famous dictionary patriotism is defined as the last resort of the scoundrel. With all due respect to an enlightened but inferior lexicographer I beg to submit that it is the first. -- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"
Current thread:
- Bandwidth Monitoring by IP Mitchell, Dan (Jun 20)
- Re: Bandwidth Monitoring by IP Tatsuya Kawasaki (Jun 20)
- Re: Bandwidth Monitoring by IP ben hubbard (Jun 20)
- Re: Bandwidth Monitoring by IP Jared Mauch (Jun 20)
- Re: Bandwidth Monitoring by IP Joel Jaeggli (Jun 20)
- Re: Bandwidth Monitoring by IP joe mcguckin (Jun 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Bandwidth Monitoring by IP Daniska Tomas (Jun 20)
- RE: Bandwidth Monitoring by IP Daniska Tomas (Jun 20)
- RE: Bandwidth Monitoring by IP Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 20)