nanog mailing list archives
Re: Bogon list
From: Joe Abley <jabley () automagic org>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 20:44:48 -0400
On Tuesday, June 4, 2002, at 07:49 , Sean M. Doran wrote:
| Messy traceroutes make the helpdesk phone ring. Messy architecture is worse!
Agreed. An inconsistent architecture is a messy one. Why treat exchange subnets differently to any other bit of backbone infrastructure? Why number point-to-point links with even locally-unique addresses?
Slashdot readers wielding traceroute can make an annoying pain in the side of your head, but traceroute and ping are not without their uses. Ask people who are cursed with running poorly-documented X.25 networks (surely there must be some left) how nice it would be to be able to map the network in-band. Ask them why they don't have any hair left, while you're at it.
There's two ways to deal with the "messy traceroute problem": [messier 1] [messier 2]
You don't need to deal with the messy traceroute problem if your consistent and clean architecture doesn't happen to make traceroute mess :)
Joe
Current thread:
- Re: Bogon list, (continued)
- Re: Bogon list Aditya (Jun 04)
- Re: Bogon list Randy Bush (Jun 04)
- Re: Bogon list Aditya (Jun 04)
- Re: Bogon list Randy Bush (Jun 04)
- Re: Bogon list David McGaugh (Jun 04)
- Re: Bogon list Leo Bicknell (Jun 04)
- RE: Bogon list Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Jun 05)
- Re: Bogon list Joe Abley (Jun 04)
- Re: Bogon list Stephen Griffin (Jun 06)
- Re: Bogon list Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 06)
- Re: Bogon list John Payne (Jun 06)
- Re: Bogon list Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 07)
- Re: Bogon list Greg A. Woods (Jun 07)
- Re: Bogon list Chris Woodfield (Jun 07)
- Re: Bogon list Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 08)