nanog mailing list archives
Re: BGP communities usage for route origin, entry point
From: "E.B. Dreger" <eddy+public+spam () noc everquick net>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 00:46:43 +0000 (GMT)
TK> Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 20:13:50 -0400 TK> From: Thomas Kernen TK> This triggered a thought, do many people actually use BGP TK> communities to pinpoint a route origination point/type, and TK> if so for what purpose (debugging, analysis, other) Analysis and mild tuning. Perhaps I'm strange, but this is one of thing things that I consider pre-sale when working with a provider with which I'm unfamiliar. It's not a deal-breaker, but is something to which I pay attention. Note that this is most significant for Web content providers, for obvious reasons. Several providers tag internally, although some do not disclose their tags. Granularity and detail vary widely. (Compare C&W with GBLX, for example.) Eddy -- Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - EverQuick Internet Division Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building Phone: +1 (785) 865-5885 Lawrence and [inter]national Phone: +1 (316) 794-8922 Wichita ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Date: Mon, 21 May 2001 11:23:58 +0000 (GMT) From: A Trap <blacklist () brics com> To: blacklist () brics com Subject: Please ignore this portion of my mail signature. These last few lines are a trap for address-harvesting spambots. Do NOT send mail to <blacklist () brics com>, or you are likely to be blocked.
Current thread:
- BGP communities usage for route origin, entry point Thomas Kernen (Jun 18)
- Re: BGP communities usage for route origin, entry point E.B. Dreger (Jun 18)
- Re: BGP communities usage for route origin, entry point Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 19)
- Re: BGP communities usage for route origin, entry point Bruno Quoitin (Jun 19)
- Re: BGP communities usage for route origin, entry point Jared Mauch (Jun 19)