nanog mailing list archives
RE: Bogon list
From: "Barry Raveendran Greene" <bgreene () cisco com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 13:33:43 -0700
On Tue, Jun 04, 2002 at 11:04:40AM -0700, David McGaugh wrote:I agree with Joe on this. At one time we were filtering 198.32/16 from our peers but ran into things like ep.net (198.32.6.31) breaking. We now only filter on IXP blocks for which we participate. While on the subject of IXP blocks, we also ended up redistributing the IXP blocks and sending them to our BGP customers (who do not receive a default) so that traceroutes and such from Looking Glasses do not break. They can then choose to filter them as they wish.Exchange point blocks SHOULDN'T be transited by anyone, therefore you should not hear them from your peers.
Agreed. But these are the IXP micro allocations - not "bogons." How you filter the IXP blocks depends on each ISP and the IXP contracts. So that would be something you would add to Rob's template.
Current thread:
- Bogon list Rob Thomas (Jun 04)
- Re: Bogon list Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 04)
- RE: Bogon list Barry Raveendran Greene (Jun 04)
- RE: Bogon list Randy Bush (Jun 04)
- Re: Bogon list Joe Abley (Jun 04)
- Re: Bogon list David McGaugh (Jun 04)
- Re: Bogon list Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 04)
- Re: Bogon list Joe Abley (Jun 04)
- Re: Bogon list Clayton Fiske (Jun 04)
- Re: Bogon list Majdi S. Abbas (Jun 04)
- RE: Bogon list Barry Raveendran Greene (Jun 04)
- RE: Bogon list Barry Raveendran Greene (Jun 04)
- Re: Bogon list Leo Bicknell (Jun 04)
- Re: Bogon list Aditya (Jun 04)
- Re: Bogon list Randy Bush (Jun 04)
- Re: Bogon list Aditya (Jun 04)
- Re: Bogon list Randy Bush (Jun 04)
- Re: Bogon list David McGaugh (Jun 04)
- Re: Bogon list Richard A Steenbergen (Jun 04)
- Re: Bogon list Leo Bicknell (Jun 04)
- RE: Bogon list Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Jun 05)