nanog mailing list archives
Re: mail-abuse.org down?
From: Joe Abley <jabley () automagic org>
Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2002 00:46:59 -0400
On Sunday, June 9, 2002, at 12:06 , John Payne wrote:
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 11:06:04AM -0400, jlewis () lewis org wrote:Yesterday morning, I noticed mail-abuse.org appeared to be down (unreachable). I checked again, and it's still unreachable. In fact, I can't even reach its name server.I did some more looking last night, and it seems it's not down, it's justunreachable from my network. Even stranger, it's only unreachable fromAtlantic.Net's primary ARIN block of 209.208.0.0/17. Traceroutes die atso-1-1-0.mpr1.sql1.us.mfnx.net (209.249.203.58).MFN have a history of dropping in blackholes for unsolicited relay tests... are you sure your njabl experiment hasn't pissed off someone at MFN enoughto drop you in?
traceroute to 209.208.0.0 (209.208.0.0), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets1 999.ge1-0.er1a.iad2.us.mfnx.net (208.185.51.2) 0.257 ms 0.177 ms 0.142 ms 2 pos8-0.mpr2.iad2.us.mfnx.net (208.185.0.13) 0.256 ms 0.182 ms 0.167 ms 3 so-2-1-0.cr2.iad1.us.mfnx.net (209.249.0.133) 0.515 ms 0.532 ms 0.516 ms 4 so-2-0-0.cr2.lga1.us.mfnx.net (208.184.233.66) 4.711 ms 4.697 ms 4.699 ms 5 so-2-1-0.cr2.ord2.us.mfnx.net (208.185.156.157) 25.015 ms 25.012 ms 25.015 ms 6 pos1-0.pr1.ord2.us.mfnx.net (208.185.0.194) 24.919 ms 24.891 ms 24.882 ms 7 uunet-abovenet-oc12.ord2.above.net (208.184.231.50) 26.255 ms 26.290 ms 26.220 ms 8 0.so-5-3-0.XL2.CHI2.ALTER.NET (152.63.68.178) 26.573 ms 26.562 ms 26.594 ms 9 0.so-1-0-0.TL2.CHI2.ALTER.NET (152.63.67.121) 26.614 ms 26.539 ms 26.570 ms 10 0.so-3-0-0.TL2.ATL5.ALTER.NET (152.63.101.50) 41.368 ms 41.412 ms 41.447 ms 11 0.so-7-0-0.CL2.ORL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.86.165) 53.946 ms 53.962 ms 54.038 ms 12 194.ATM7-0.GW7.ORL1.ALTER.NET (152.63.84.221) 54.343 ms 54.545 ms 54.220 ms 13 atlanticnet-gw.customer.ALTER.NET (157.130.65.130) 231.598 ms 68.260 ms 44.103 ms 14 gsvlflma-br-1-s4-0.atlantic.net (209.208.90.30) 49.813 ms 49.180 ms 49.879 ms 15 gsvlfl-br-1-s2-0.atlantic.net (209.208.6.126) 50.244 ms 49.778 ms 49.695 ms
16 *^C Guess not.
Current thread:
- Re: mail-abuse.org down?, (continued)
- Re: mail-abuse.org down? Sean Donelan (Jun 08)
- Re: mail-abuse.org down? Marshall Eubanks (Jun 09)
- Inconsistent routes, was Re: mail-abuse.org down? Rob Thomas (Jun 09)
- Re: Inconsistent routes, was Re: mail-abuse.org down? Rob Thomas (Jun 09)
- Re: Inconsistent routes, was Re: mail-abuse.org down? Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 09)
- Re: Inconsistent routes, was Re: mail-abuse.org down? Marshall Eubanks (Jun 09)
- Re: Inconsistent routes, was Re: mail-abuse.org down? Joe Provo (Jun 10)
- Re: Inconsistent routes, was Re: mail-abuse.org down? Marshall Eubanks (Jun 10)
- Re: Inconsistent routes, was Re: mail-abuse.org down? Marshall Eubanks (Jun 11)
- Re: mail-abuse.org down? Marshall Eubanks (Jun 09)
- Re: mail-abuse.org down? Sean Donelan (Jun 08)
- Re: mail-abuse.org down? Joe Abley (Jun 08)
- Re: mail-abuse.org down? John Payne (Jun 08)
- Re: mail-abuse.org down? Joe Abley (Jun 08)