nanog mailing list archives
RE: NAS filed chp 11
From: James <james () james-web net>
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 15:19:08 -0400
now someone will surely step up to the plate in their defence and rant about how this is all a good thing for NASC and how they will go on to reemerge next year as a lean, mean, bigger & better company.
I think at this point we are all long past the innocent stage and rapidly approaching apathy. - James
Current thread:
- NAS filed chp 11 Christopher X. Candreva (Jun 06)
- Re: NAS filed chp 11 Dan Hollis (Jun 06)
- Re: NAS filed chp 11 E.B. Dreger (Jun 06)
- RE: NAS filed chp 11 James (Jun 06)
- RE: NAS filed chp 11 Randy Bush (Jun 07)
- Re: NAS filed chp 11 Steven J. Sobol (Jun 06)
- Re: NAS filed chp 11 Grant A. Kirkwood (Jun 06)
- Re: NAS filed chp 11 Dan Hollis (Jun 06)