nanog mailing list archives
Re: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server.
From: Daniel Concepcion <dani () intelideas com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 16:31:21 +0200
Yes, but there is problem about the transit for the network of the IXP In my experience, some big providers only have the commercial view of internet. Really, if all the IXP members give some transit to the IXP for essential services, internet will be more robust. Daniel Intelideas On Thursday 06 June 2002 16:07, Nipper, Arnold wrote:
As a lot of people are offering secondary services: may be it's a good idea to place infrastructural services at IXP. IXP seem to be more stable than any ISPs and often more neutral than ISPs. Comments? Arnold
Current thread:
- Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server., (continued)
- Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. Bruce Campbell (Jun 11)
- Message not available
- Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. Joao Luis Silva Damas (Jun 06)
- Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. John L Crain (Jun 05)
- Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. Jesper Skriver (Jun 06)
- Re: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. Nipper, Arnold (Jun 06)
- Re: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. Jared Mauch (Jun 06)
- Re: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. Måns Nilsson (Jun 06)
- Re: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Jun 07)
- Re: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. Stephen J. Wilcox (Jun 06)
- Re: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. Chrisy Luke (Jun 06)
- Re: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. Jared Mauch (Jun 06)
- Re: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. Arnold Nipper (Jun 06)
- Re: Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. Arnold Nipper (Jun 06)
- Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. John Payne (Jun 06)
- Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. bmanning (Jun 06)
- Re: KPNQwest ns.eu.net server. John Payne (Jun 06)