nanog mailing list archives
RE: debugging packet loss
From: Andy Dills <andy () xecu net>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2002 14:36:39 -0400 (EDT)
On Tue, 23 Jul 2002, Phil Rosenthal wrote:
--- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu] On Behalf Of Jason Lewis Isn't ping the first thing to be dropped in favor of other traffic? I remember a similar issue and Cisco saying that was the behavior. Don't quote me on that. jas --- Even if it is, that still means that other packets could be lost had those pings not been there.
Not neccessarily. It's my experience that ciscos will sometime drop icmp instead of replying when under load...but that's only for packets directed at its interfaces. So, I might see 5% packetloss from the router itself, but 0% packetloss for everything behind it. Andy xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Andy Dills 301-682-9972 Xecunet, LLC www.xecu.net xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Dialup * Webhosting * E-Commerce * High-Speed Access
Current thread:
- debugging packet loss Ralph Doncaster (Jul 23)
- Re: debugging packet loss Jason Lewis (Jul 23)
- RE: debugging packet loss Phil Rosenthal (Jul 23)
- RE: debugging packet loss Andy Dills (Jul 23)
- RE: debugging packet loss Phil Rosenthal (Jul 23)
- Re: debugging packet loss Wes Bachman (Jul 23)
- Re: debugging packet loss Daniel Roesen (Jul 23)
- Re: debugging packet loss Jason Lewis (Jul 23)