nanog mailing list archives
RE: PSINet/Cogent Latency
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex () nac net>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2002 23:59:25 -0400 (Eastern Daylight Time)
Packet loss is not guaranteed, especially considering the queuing mechanism used is not disclosed. IE, a simply hold queue north of 2048 will cause no loss, but the occasional jitter/latency, most likely not even measureable by common endpoints on the net. I'm not endorsing, just correcting. On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Randy Bush wrote:
40mb/s isn't "loaded" for a DS3?if you are measuring 40mb at five min intervals, micro peaks are pegged out causing serious packet loss. randy
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex () nac net, latency, Al Reuben -- -- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
Current thread:
- Re: PSINet/Cogent Latency, (continued)
- Re: PSINet/Cogent Latency Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 22)
- Re: PSINet/Cogent Latency Vadim Antonov (Jul 23)
- Re: PSINet/Cogent Latency Matthew S. Hallacy (Jul 23)
- Re: PSINet/Cogent Latency Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 22)
- Re: PSINet/Cogent Latency Matt Zimmerman (Jul 23)
- Re: PSINet/Cogent Latency Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 23)
- RE: PSINet/Cogent Latency Alex Rubenstein (Jul 23)
- Re: PSINet/Cogent Latency Doug Clements (Jul 22)
- RE: PSINet/Cogent Latency Phil Rosenthal (Jul 22)
- Re: PSINet/Cogent Latency Matt Zimmerman (Jul 23)
- RE: PSINet/Cogent Latency Alex Rubenstein (Jul 22)
- Re: PSINet/Cogent Latency Streiner, Justin (Jul 23)
- Re: PSINet/Cogent Latency Scott Granados (Jul 23)