nanog mailing list archives
Re: What is a reasonable range for global BGP table size?
From: Joe Abley <jabley () automagic org>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 17:49:28 -0400
On Thursday, July 18, 2002, at 05:25 , Marshall Eubanks wrote:
I still don't see where the excess 20K routes come from. Could these be internal routes from an iBGP ?
The export policy of contributors to route-views collectors is not well-defined. While some participants might be sending a customer or peer view, others are quite likely including all kinds of deaggregated bloat which only has intra-AS application, and that would never normally be seen by a peer AS.
Joe
Current thread:
- Re: What is a reasonable range for global BGP table size?, (continued)
- Re: What is a reasonable range for global BGP table size? Jared Mauch (Jul 18)
- Re: What is a reasonable range for global BGP table size? Me (Jul 17)
- Re: What is a reasonable range for global BGP table size? Rob Thomas (Jul 17)
- Re: What is a reasonable range for global BGP table size? Marshall Eubanks (Jul 17)
- Re: What is a reasonable range for global BGP table size? senthil ayyasamy (Jul 17)
- Re: What is a reasonable range for global BGP table size? Ross Chandler (Jul 17)
- Re: What is a reasonable range for global BGP table size? Rob Thomas (Jul 17)
- RE: What is a reasonable range for global BGP table size? Kris Foster (Jul 18)
- Re: What is a reasonable range for global BGP table size? Jared Mauch (Jul 18)
- Re: What is a reasonable range for global BGP table size? Marshall Eubanks (Jul 18)
- Re: What is a reasonable range for global BGP table size? Joe Abley (Jul 18)
- Re: What is a reasonable range for global BGP table size? Jared Mauch (Jul 18)