nanog mailing list archives
RE: Sprint peering policy
From: David Schwartz <davids () webmaster com>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2002 13:38:21 -0700
On Mon, 1 Jul 2002 13:22:25 -0400, Phil Rosenthal wrote:
But if you were hungrier, and they were the only place that had food, they *COULD* charge whatever they want, and you'd be willing to pay it, no? --Phil
Obviously any business would like to get the highest possible price for anything they sell and not one dollar less. On the other hand, if a deal provides any net benefit, once all costs are taken into account, a rational company will take it. So if company X refuses a deal that provides it a net benefit just because company Y gets more out of it than company X, and as a result company Y goes to company Z instead, company X has acted foolishly and irrationally. DS
Current thread:
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard Irving (Jul 01)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Sprint peering policy Rizzo Frank (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy David Schwartz (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy alex (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy Paul A Flores (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy David Schwartz (Jul 01)
- Game Theory (was: RE: Sprint peering policy) Scott A Crosby (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard Irving (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy Phil Rosenthal (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy David Schwartz (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy Daniel Golding (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard Irving (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy Daniel Golding (Jul 01)
- RE: Sprint peering policy Phil Rosenthal (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Clayton Fiske (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy alex (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Clayton Fiske (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 01)
- Re: Sprint peering policy alex (Jul 02)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard Irving (Jul 02)
- Re: Sprint peering policy Richard Irving (Jul 01)