nanog mailing list archives
RE: Internet vulnerabilities
From: "Daniel Golding" <dgolding () sockeye com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2002 11:31:32 -0400
RFC1546. Really, anycast is a bad name for it. "nearcast" or "closecast" might be better. Anycast just has a nice ring... - Daniel Golding
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of Marshall Eubanks Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 7:44 AM To: Bill Woodcock; Marshall Eubanks Cc: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Internet vulnerabilities On Thu, 4 Jul 2002 18:43:44 -0700 (PDT) Bill Woodcock <woody () zocalo net> wrote:On Thu, 4 Jul 2002, Marshall Eubanks wrote: > Is this the anycast based on MSDP ? Anycast, not multicast. -BillBut the only IPv4 anycast that I know of does use MSDP : http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mboned-anycast-rp-08.txt Is there a different proposal ? What's the RFC / I-D name ? Regards Marshall
Current thread:
- WorldComm Fiber Cut????, (continued)
- WorldComm Fiber Cut???? Gerardo A. Gregory (Jul 07)
- Re: WorldComm Fiber Cut???? Sean Donelan (Jul 07)
- Re: WorldComm Fiber Cut???? neil d. quiogue (Jul 07)
- Re: WorldComm Fiber Cut???? Pawlukiewicz Jane (Jul 08)
- Re: Internet vulnerabilities Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 07)
- Re: Internet vulnerabilities Bill Woodcock (Jul 07)
- RE: Internet vulnerabilities Bill Woodcock (Jul 05)
- RE: Internet vulnerabilities Sean Donelan (Jul 05)
- Re: Internet vulnerabilities Marshall Eubanks (Jul 05)
- RE: Internet vulnerabilities Bill Woodcock (Jul 05)
- RE: Internet vulnerabilities Daniel Golding (Jul 08)
- RE: Internet vulnerabilities jnull (Jul 05)