nanog mailing list archives
Re: wcom overbilling
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank () att net il>
Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2002 07:04:31 +0300
At 04:50 PM 06-07-02 +0100, Stephen J. Wilcox wrote:
.. which is why I think people (especially US altho it seems to be coming morethe normal in other markets) use EBITDA as it smooths out the bumps even tho thebumps are still there! The other nice thing in the telecoms world about EBITDA is the 'D' which seems to work quite well at hiding losses caused by falling fibre/bandwidth prices!
From Barrons: EBITDA = Earnings Before I Tricked the Dumb Auditor -Hank
Steve
Current thread:
- Re: wcom overbilling, (continued)
- Re: wcom overbilling Mark Radabaugh - Amplex (Jul 05)
- Re: wcom overbilling Bruce Robertson (Jul 06)
- Re: wcom overbilling Paul Vixie (Jul 06)
- Re: wcom overbilling Mark Radabaugh - Amplex (Jul 05)
- Re: wcom overbilling Jeff Mcadams (Jul 06)
- Re: wcom overbilling Marshall Eubanks (Jul 06)
- Re: wcom overbilling blitz (Jul 06)
- Re: wcom overbilling Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 06)
- Re: wcom overbilling Robert Boyle (Jul 06)
- Re: wcom overbilling Scott Weeks (Jul 06)
- Re: wcom overbilling Robert Boyle (Jul 06)
- Message not available
- Re: wcom overbilling Hank Nussbacher (Jul 06)