nanog mailing list archives

RE: Internet vulnerabilities

From: Martin Hannigan <hannigan () fugawi net>
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2002 01:03:22 -0400


At 04:20 PM 7/4/2002 -0500, jnelson wrote:

Keep the gloves up...cruft...lol, but if you wanted to compare Cisco
"features", I've dealt with some bugs that would cook your hair.



I don't think software is a good focus. Facility destruction would be a far

worse "attack" than software. I think we'd recover much faster from a"layer 3" +

attack vs. a layer 1 attack.

Current thread:

RE: Internet vulnerabilities, (continued)
- RE: Internet vulnerabilities Phil Rosenthal (Jul 04)
  - RE: Internet vulnerabilities Deepak Jain (Jul 04)
    - RE: Internet vulnerabilities Stephen J. Wilcox (Jul 05)
    - Re: Internet vulnerabilities Eric Gauthier (Jul 05)
    - Re: Internet vulnerabilities Randy Bush (Jul 05)
  - Re: Internet vulnerabilities Sandy Harris (Jul 04)
- Re: Internet vulnerabilities batz (Jul 04)
  - RE: Internet vulnerabilities jnelson (Jul 04)
    - Re: Internet vulnerabilities Richard A Steenbergen (Jul 04)
    - RE: Internet vulnerabilities jnelson (Jul 04)
    - RE: Internet vulnerabilities Martin Hannigan (Jul 04)
- Re: Internet vulnerabilities Mike Tancsa (Jul 04)
  - Re: Internet vulnerabilities David Lesher (Jul 04)
  - Re: Internet vulnerabilities Paul Vixie (Jul 04)
    - Re: Internet vulnerabilities Marshall Eubanks (Jul 04)
    - Re: Internet vulnerabilities Paul Vixie (Jul 04)
    - Re: Internet vulnerabilities E.B. Dreger (Jul 04)
    - Re: Internet vulnerabilities Bill Woodcock (Jul 04)
    - Re: Internet vulnerabilities Marshall Eubanks (Jul 05)
    - Re: Internet vulnerabilities Bill Woodcock (Jul 05)
    - RE: Internet vulnerabilities Barry Raveendran Greene (Jul 05)

(Thread continues...)