nanog mailing list archives
Re: OC-768 availability?
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis () kurtis pp se>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2002 10:16:51 +0200
--On Monday, July 29, 2002 21:32:02 -0400 blitz <blitz () macronet net> wrote:
Seriously, I don't see OC768 coming online en masse until they get the kinks worked out of optical switching. The transit times are so short thru the innards, in the order of picoseconds, that electronics is way too slow to perform such mundane tasks like determining where a packet is supposed to go. Thus, all this will require optical computing to be available cheaply and a lot more widespread than it is now.
...and : a) Someone got the money to buy the gear b) We have used the current capacity (see a). - kurtis -
Current thread:
- OC-768 availability? dalph (Jul 29)
- Re: OC-768 availability? blitz (Jul 29)
- Re: OC-768 availability? Scott Granados (Jul 29)
- Re: OC-768 availability? John Kinsella (Jul 29)
- Re: OC-768 availability? Kurt Erik Lindqvist (Jul 30)
- Re: OC-768 availability? Dr. Mosh (Jul 30)
- RE: OC-768 availability? Deepak Jain (Jul 30)
- Re: OC-768 availability? blitz (Jul 30)
- Re: OC-768 availability? Scott Granados (Jul 30)
- Re: OC-768 availability? Scott Granados (Jul 29)
- Re: OC-768 availability? blitz (Jul 29)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: OC-768 availability? Williams, Ken (Jul 29)
- RE: OC-768 availability? Scott Weeks (Jul 29)
- Re: OC-768 availability? blitz (Jul 30)
- RE: OC-768 availability? Rowland, Alan D (Jul 30)