nanog mailing list archives
Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex () nac net>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2002 15:40:35 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
[1] at least it's free to the poster....not to the networks that keep having to build ridiculously larger news servers. The first news server I ran for an ISP had 4GB...and that was for the OS and articles. The most recent has 18GB for OS, 288GB for articles...and it's obviously obsolete if others are accepting 300GB/day. When are the operators going to draw the line and say "no more" to binaries?
Perhaps the same time the end-users (whose fees go towards paying for the hardware, presumably) say "we don't want binaries anymore." -- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex () nac net, latency, Al Reuben -- -- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
Current thread:
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth, (continued)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Chris Adams (Feb 03)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Toerless Eckert (Feb 03)
- multicast resources (Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth) Jared Mauch (Feb 03)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Stephen Griffin (Feb 03)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Jared Mauch (Feb 04)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Stephen Griffin (Feb 05)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Stephen Griffin (Feb 05)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Jared Mauch (Feb 05)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Stephen Griffin (Feb 05)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Alex Rubenstein (Feb 02)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth jlewis (Feb 02)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth measl (Feb 02)
- Message not available
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Robert Boyle (Feb 02)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Vadim Antonov (Feb 08)
- RE: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Deepak Jain (Feb 08)
- RE: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Vadim Antonov (Feb 08)
- Re: Reducing Usenet Bandwidth Stephen Sprunk (Feb 09)