nanog mailing list archives
Re: testing sprint
From: <measl () mfn org>
Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 20:41:34 -0600 (CST)
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Christopher A. Woodfield wrote:
Sprint, to date, hasn't the balls to terminate ANYONE for spamming outside of dialup users, IIRC.
They terminate dial users for abuse now? When did _that_ start? Sprint is the only place where I can *count* on seeing accounts whacked for abuse doing the Gypsy Dance for years to come, even (especially) if they haven't "reformed". -- Yours, J.A. Terranson sysadmin () mfn org If Governments really want us to behave like civilized human beings, they should give serious consideration towards setting a better example: Ruling by force, rather than consensus; the unrestrained application of unjust laws (which the victim-populations were never allowed input on in the first place); the State policy of justice only for the rich and elected; the intentional abuse and occassionally destruction of entire populations merely to distract an already apathetic and numb electorate... This type of demogoguery must surely wipe out the fascist United States as surely as it wiped out the fascist Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. The views expressed here are mine, and NOT those of my employers, associates, or others. Besides, if it *were* the opinion of all of those people, I doubt there would be a problem to bitch about in the first place... --------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- testing sprint Eric A. Hall (Feb 06)
- Re: testing sprint Matthew S. Hallacy (Feb 06)
- Re: testing sprint Christopher A. Woodfield (Feb 07)
- Re: testing sprint measl (Feb 07)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: testing sprint Matthew S. Hallacy (Feb 11)
- Re: testing sprint Christopher A. Woodfield (Feb 11)
- Re: testing sprint measl (Feb 11)