nanog mailing list archives
RE: Fwd: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users"
From: "Marc Pierrat" <marc () sunchar com>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 11:35:07 -0500
-----Original Message----- From: owner-nanog () merit edu [mailto:owner-nanog () merit edu]On Behalf Of Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu Sent: Friday, February 01, 2002 11:18 AM To: David Charlap Cc: nanog () merit edu Subject: Re: Fwd: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" RFC2734 IPv4 over IEEE 1394. P. Johansson. December 1999. (Format: TXT=69314 bytes) (Status: PROPOSED STANDARD) Better yet: use RFC1149 or 2549 which adds QoS... just think of the possiblities.
Current thread:
- Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users", (continued)
- Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" Chris Adams (Jan 31)
- Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 01)
- Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" David Charlap (Feb 01)
- Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" Jim Shankland (Feb 01)
- Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" Jon Mansey (Feb 01)
- Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 01)
- Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" Chris Adams (Jan 31)
- Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" Owen DeLong (Feb 01)
- Re: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" Eric A. Hall (Feb 01)
- Re: Fwd: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 01)
- RE: Fwd: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" Marc Pierrat (Feb 01)
- Re: Fwd: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" Matthew S. Hallacy (Feb 04)
- Re: Fwd: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 04)
- RE: Fwd: SlashDot: "Comcast Gunning for NAT Users" Dan Hollis (Feb 01)