nanog mailing list archives
Re: AOL & Cogent
From: Jeff S Wheeler <jsw () five-elements com>
Date: 29 Dec 2002 16:13:36 -0500
On Sun, 2002-12-29 at 15:57, Jeff S Wheeler wrote:
Basil,
Oops. Obviously, I posted this to the list by mistake. But in any case, for those of you who are "relying upon" cogent pricing to make your business model work, it should be easy to figure out that at some point, you might start getting what you are paying for. If you only have one vendor that can sell you the product you need at the price you need to make your business work, you are putting all your eggs in one basket. Your investors and customers should be concerned. It's time for companies in this situation to stop complaining at cogent or AOL or the double-secret peering cabal, and start realizing that they need to make arrangements with other vendors in order to give themselves the flexibility to avoid problems such as this. Sorry for the accidental post :-) -- Jeff S Wheeler <jsw () five-elements com>
Current thread:
- Re: AOL & Cogent, (continued)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Basil Kruglov (Dec 28)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Richard A Steenbergen (Dec 28)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Basil Kruglov (Dec 30)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Omachonu Ogali (Dec 30)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Basil Kruglov (Dec 30)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Jeff S Wheeler (Dec 30)
- Re: AOL & Cogent E.B. Dreger (Dec 30)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Stephen J. Wilcox (Dec 30)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Richard A Steenbergen (Dec 28)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Basil Kruglov (Dec 28)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Jeff S Wheeler (Dec 29)
- RE: AOL & Cogent David Diaz (Dec 21)