nanog mailing list archives
AOL & Cogent
From: Andrew Partan <asp () partan com>
Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2002 14:47:24 -0500
I was poking around to see what was happening with Cogent and AOL and ran into some interesting info. The test that Cogent failed was a 2:1 ratio; Cogent was at 3:1 and AOL insisted they be at no more than 2:1 for free peering. AOL wants Cogent to pay for peering - the pricing I've heard is $50-/meg for paid peering - which I think is more than street price for transit... Hmm; I wonder if this change in policy has anything to do with John Schanz's recent move from Sprint to AOL? --asp
Current thread:
- AOL & Cogent Andrew Partan (Dec 19)
- RE: AOL & Cogent Deepak Jain (Dec 20)
- RE: AOL & Cogent Stephen J. Wilcox (Dec 20)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Neil J. McRae (Dec 21)
- RE: AOL & Cogent Stephen J. Wilcox (Dec 20)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Leo Bicknell (Dec 28)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Richard A Steenbergen (Dec 28)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Leo Bicknell (Dec 28)
- Re: AOL & Cogent David Schwartz (Dec 28)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Paul Vixie (Dec 28)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Mike Leber (Dec 29)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Paul Vixie (Dec 29)
- Re: AOL & Cogent Richard A Steenbergen (Dec 28)
- RE: AOL & Cogent Deepak Jain (Dec 20)