nanog mailing list archives
Re: Cogent and Level3 Peering Issues
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell () ufp org>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 13:55:58 -0500
In a message written on Wed, Dec 18, 2002 at 10:02:13AM -0800, william () elan net wrote:
I pointed that out on another list too but somebody else responded that abovenet to aol connection is congested as it is and more then likely would not have been able to take all the extra traffic. I'm not a customer
There are no congestion issues between 6461 and 1668 at this time. If someone believes there is a problem please have them contact me off list so I can look into it. I can make no comment on the volume of traffic, having no idea what volume is involved. If you consider the paths that are available for a moment, I think most people can deduce why they are choosing the Level 3 path, and it has nothing to do with performance. -- Leo Bicknell - bicknell () ufp org - CCIE 3440 PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/ Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request () tmbg org, www.tmbg.org
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- Re: Cogent and Level3 Peering Issues, (continued)
- Re: Cogent and Level3 Peering Issues alex (Dec 18)
- Re: Cogent and Level3 Peering Issues Basil Kruglov (Dec 18)
- Re: Cogent and Level3 Peering Issues alex (Dec 18)
- Re: Cogent and Level3 Peering Issues william (Dec 18)
- Re: Cogent and Level3 Peering Issues Petri Helenius (Dec 18)
- Re: Cogent and Level3 Peering Issues alex (Dec 18)
- Re: Cogent and Level3 Peering Issues william (Dec 18)
- Re: Cogent and Level3 Peering Issues alex (Dec 18)
- Cogent Thrashing Box Available. IPERF and Web Mike (meuon) Harrison (Dec 19)
- Re: Cogent and Level3 Peering Issues william (Dec 18)
- Re: Cogent and Level3 Peering Issues Leo Bicknell (Dec 18)