nanog mailing list archives
Re: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks?
From: Miles Fidelman <mfidelman () civicnet org>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 10:48:09 -0500 (EST)
On 10 Dec 2002, Nigel Titley wrote:
2) Does anyone else see a HUGE problem with listing a /19 because there is one /32 of a spam advertised website? When did this start happening?Since SPEWS, with its complete lack of accountability, started being used by respectable spam blocking software. Yes, its a massive problem.
We had this problem a while back too. One particular problem is that the relays.osirusoft.com block-list - which seems to be used by an awful of people - aggregates data from several dozen sources, including spews.
Current thread:
- Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks? Mark Segal (Dec 10)
- Re: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks? Nigel Titley (Dec 10)
- Re: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks? Miles Fidelman (Dec 10)
- Re: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks? Neil J. McRae (Dec 10)
- Re: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks? deeann mikula (Dec 10)
- Re: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks? hostmaster (Dec 10)
- Re: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks? Barry Shein (Dec 10)
- Re: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks? Stephen Sprunk (Dec 10)
- Re: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks? Stephen J. Wilcox (Dec 10)
- Re: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks? Vadim Antonov (Dec 10)
- Re: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks? K. Scott Bethke (Dec 10)
- Re: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks? Nigel Titley (Dec 10)
- Re: Spam. Again.. -- and blocking net blocks? Ralph Doncaster (Dec 10)