nanog mailing list archives
Re: HTTP proxies, was Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8...
From: Michael Lamoureux <lamour () mail argfrp us uu net>
Date: 10 Dec 2002 09:45:39 -0500
"michael" == Michael Dillon <Michael.Dillon () radianz com> writes:
How do we get software vendors (free, pay, virus) to distribute software with appropriate defaults?
michael> Second step, publish a directory. I.e. detect the michael> non-conforming devices and publish their IP addresses in an michael> LDAP server. Let me get this straight, you are suggesting that the way to fix the problem that there are potentially millions of insecure machines connected to the Internet is to *PUBLISH* the IP addresses of all of them in an easy to parse format? Cute. Don't tell me...we'll be able to pull the vulnerability that got the hosts in the list too, so we can verify that "our" machines are, indeed, misconfigured? ;-) baffled, Michael
Current thread:
- Re: HTTP proxies, was Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Michael . Dillon (Dec 09)
- Re: HTTP proxies, was Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Michael Lamoureux (Dec 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: HTTP proxies, was Re: Operational Issues with 69.0.0.0/8... Michael . Dillon (Dec 10)