nanog mailing list archives
Re: 31 bit ptp link addressing?
From: Stephen Griffin <stephen.griffin () rcn com>
Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2002 20:30:30 -0500 (EST)
In the referenced message, Adrian Chadd said:
Hi all, Just (mostly) out of personal curiousity - is anyone here running any PtP links using 31 bit prefixes rather than the /30's we're all happy with? If you go "huh?" take a look at rfc3021 - "Using 31-Bit Prefixes on IPv4 Point-to-Point Links" Thanks, Adrian
Yes, and it works wonderfully. The only issue is (for me) getting around the thought that even=low and odd=high, vs the case where odd=low and even=high. For example, when I'm on a router, look at an interface, and want to ping the other end, I have to get out of years of autopilot.
Current thread:
- 31 bit ptp link addressing? Adrian Chadd (Apr 05)
- Re: 31 bit ptp link addressing? Stephen Griffin (Apr 05)
- Re: 31 bit ptp link addressing? Jared Mauch (Apr 05)
- Re: 31 bit ptp link addressing? Adrian Chadd (Apr 13)
- Re: 31 bit ptp link addressing? Adrian Chadd (Apr 15)