nanog mailing list archives

Re: genuity - any good?

From: neil () DOMINO ORG (Neil J. McRae)
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 19:08:27 +0100 (BST)

1) Their BGP polices are not as good as others.  They force you to register
each route you want to advertise rather than allowing you to advertise any
reasonable route for your prefixes.  According to one of their top people,
prefix-lists were unreliable new technology.  We gave up and canceled the
circuit.


Man I don't know of a provider that doesn't do this - but the
fact is this is a good thing.

Current thread:

genuity - any good? matthew zeier (Apr 11)
- Re: genuity - any good? Anthony D Cennami (Apr 11)
- Re: genuity - any good? Sean Donelan (Apr 11)
- Re: genuity - any good? Mark Kent (Apr 11)
  - Re: genuity - any good? Hank Nussbacher (Apr 11)
    - Re: genuity - any good? Neil J. McRae (Apr 12)
- Re: genuity - any good? Roy (Apr 12)
  - Re: genuity - any good? Neil J. McRae (Apr 12)
  - Re: genuity - any good? Simon Lyall (Apr 12)
  - Re: genuity - any good? Stephen Griffin (Apr 12)
    - Re: genuity - any good? Roy (Apr 12)
    - Re: genuity - any good? Aditya (Apr 12)
    - Re: genuity - any good? Sean Donelan (Apr 12)
    - Re: genuity - any good? David Schwartz (Apr 12)
    - Re: genuity - any good? Richard A Steenbergen (Apr 13)
    - Re: genuity - any good? Mark Kent (Apr 12)
    - Route Filtering (Was: Re: genuity - any good?) Leo Bicknell (Apr 12)
    - RE: genuity - any good? David Luyer (Apr 12)

(Thread continues...)