nanog mailing list archives
Re: OT? cRTP header compression
From: "Thomas Kernen" <tkernen () deckpoint ch>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 15:01:48 -0400
Hi Antonio, Agreed with all the info you mention below, I am only talking about RTP vs cRTP usage on diff series, does anyone have info with the CPU uage vs the number of calls/sessions/DS0s sent accross the link that has header compression enabled? All the rest related to QoS, Link Fragmentation, packet size and so on has been covered. Thomas ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pena, Antonio" <Antonio_Pena () verestar com> To: "'Thomas Kernen'" <tkernen () deckpoint ch>; <nanog () merit edu> Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 11:55 PM Subject: RE: OT? cRTP header compression
Hello Thomas I had some kind of experience doing cRTP over Cisco routers, we use
Cisco
7204 & 7206 Routers on the IP Gateways and Cisco's 3600 and 5300 as
VoIP
gateways, as well we had a small setup using a Cisco 2611 router on
the
termination router. The trick is change the VoIP payload size of each packet to reduce the packets per second in a half improving the performance over the
routers,
also we are using as Cisco recommends TCP & RTP headers compression
over the
circuits using only MLPPP encapsulation. Also please note that using cRTP and Compression you have increased
the
switching delay over the circuit and for that reason you may need also
to
have more processing power of the router. Below you can see a Cisco site where you can check the recommendations
for
this setup and also based on that information I created a Bandwidth calculator on an excel sheet, if you want it, just drop me an email, I
will
send it you. http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/788/voice-qos/voip-mlppp.html
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/788/pkt-voice-general/bwidth_consume.ht ml
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/ fqos
_c/fqcprt6/qcfcrtp.htm http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/105/compression-qos.html Bye Antonio J. Pena Manager, Network Engineering ( /_ _ _ __/_ _ |_/(-/ (-_) /(// Verestar, inc. 1901 Main street Santa Monica, CA, 90405 Phone(310)382-3300 Direct(310)382-3409 antonio_pena () verestar com http://www.verestar.com -----Original Message----- From: Thomas Kernen [mailto:tkernen () deckpoint ch] Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2002 1:11 PM To: nanog () merit edu Subject: OT? cRTP header compression I'm looking for real world experience related to deploying cRTP header compression on Cisco routers related to VoIP flows. We are trying to evalute what type of hardware (ie: CPU power since cRTP is CEF
switched
since 12.2x IIRC) is required to handle 96/192/384 VoIP calls over a single circuit (HDLC/PPP/FR). This is related to specific overseas circuits where the cost of the circuit is still very expensive vs the cost for the extra hardware to handle the header compression. I'm disregarding all QoS info at this stage. Cheers Thomas
Current thread:
- OT? cRTP header compression Thomas Kernen (Apr 10)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: OT? cRTP header compression Pena, Antonio (Apr 10)
- Re: OT? cRTP header compression Thomas Kernen (Apr 11)
- RE: OT? cRTP header compression Mathew Lodge (Apr 11)
- RE: OT? cRTP header compression Nathan Stratton (Apr 11)
- RE: OT? cRTP header compression Christian Kuhtz (Apr 11)
- RE: OT? cRTP header compression Nathan Stratton (Apr 11)
- RE: OT? cRTP header compression Nathan Stratton (Apr 11)
- Re: OT? cRTP header compression Thomas Kernen (Apr 11)
- Message not available
- RE: OT? cRTP header compression Mathew Lodge (Apr 11)
- RE: OT? cRTP header compression Nathan Stratton (Apr 11)