nanog mailing list archives
Re: Credit for Attack
From: Joe Shaw <jshaw () insync net>
Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2001 16:18:16 -0500 (CDT)
On Tue, 11 Sep 2001, Larry Diffey wrote:
FYI - Apparently, the Taliban has specifically come out and said that Osama Bin Laden has NOTHING to do with this attack and condemned the bombings. To me this virtually guarantees that he had something to do with it.
CNBC is reporting that according to two Sr. US Intelligence officials the current most likely suspect is indeed Osama Bin Laden. If I were the Taliban, I'd be preparing to offer him up. I think the reason they initially indicated that he had nothing to do with it is because they are afraid, as they should be, of a swift reprisal. If they can connect it to him, I would not want to be a resident of Afghanistan. Regards, -- Joseph W. Shaw II Network Security Specialist/CCNA Unemployed. Will hack for food. God Bless. Apparently I'm overqualified but undereducated to be employed.
Current thread:
- Re: World Trade Center attack, (continued)
- Re: World Trade Center attack Steven J. Sobol (Sep 11)
- RE: World Trade Center attack Eric Germann (Sep 11)
- RE: World Trade Center attack Steven J. Sobol (Sep 11)
- RE: World Trade Center attack Opentransit NOC - German Martinez (Sep 11)
- RE: World Trade Center attack Christian Nielsen (Sep 11)
- RE: World Trade Center attack Jim Popovitch (Sep 11)
- Re: World Trade Center attack Ulf Zimmermann (Sep 11)
- Credit for Attack Larry Diffey (Sep 11)
- Re: Credit for Attack Joe Shaw (Sep 11)
- Re: Credit for Attack Joel Jaeggli (Sep 11)
- Operational Content only please. Simon Lyall (Sep 11)
- Re: Operational Content only please. John Fraizer (Sep 11)
- Re: Operational Content only please. EA Louie (Sep 12)
- Re: Operational Content only please. Brian Wallingford (Sep 11)
- Re: Operational Content only please. Todd Suiter (Sep 12)
- RE: World Trade Center attack Alexander Kiwerski (Sep 11)
- Re: World Trade Center attack ben hubbard (Sep 11)