nanog mailing list archives
Re: once again: RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user
From: Jeff Mcadams <jeffm () iglou com>
Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2001 22:05:21 -0400
Also sprach Doug Clements
Um, I think we got doubly off-topic. Nobody is talking about forcing NAT on all their customers.
Talk to Cincinnati Bell/Zoomtown. They are almost, but not quite, forcing NAT on, not only their customers, but the customers of any ISP that uses Zoomtown to provide DSL in the Cincinnati area.
this thread has gone on long enough.
I will heartily agree with this statement, though, for sure. -- Jeff McAdams Email: jeffm () iglou com Head Network Administrator Voice: (502) 966-3848 IgLou Internet Services (800) 436-4456
Current thread:
- once again: RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user Roeland Meyer (Sep 09)
- Re: once again: RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user Doug Clements (Sep 09)
- Re: once again: RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user Jeff Mcadams (Sep 09)
- Re: once again: RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user Vadim Antonov (Sep 09)
- Re: once again: RE: Where NAT disenfranchises the end-user Doug Clements (Sep 09)