nanog mailing list archives
Re: multiple b0rkenness?
From: Marius Strom <marius () marius org>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:44:46 -0500
John, List not broke, but I concur with what you're seeing. BGP flap-statistics through all three of our upstreams (primarily AS209 (Qwest)) have gone through the roof. On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 02:34:22PM -0700, John Payne wrote:
The silence is deafening... multiple provider brokenness, (I'm seeing problems on abovenet and XO and have heard of problems on at least 3 other big providers) and no Donelan special report, or anyone asking if $provider is having trouble? Or is the mailing list broken? -- John Payne http://sackheads.org/jpayne/ john () sackheads org http://sackheads.org/uce/ Fax: +44 870 0547954 To send me mail, use the address in the From: header
-- Marius Strom <marius () marius org> Professional Geek/Unix System Administrator URL: http://www.marius.org/ http://www.marius.org/marius.pgp 0xF5D89089 *updated 2001-02-26* It is a natural law. Physics tells us that for every action, there must be an equal and opposite reaction. They hate us, we hate them, they hate us back and so, here we are, victims of mathematics. -- Londo, "A Voice in the Wilderness I"
Current thread:
- multiple b0rkenness? John Payne (Sep 26)
- Re: multiple b0rkenness? Marius Strom (Sep 26)
- Re: multiple b0rkenness? Leo Bicknell (Sep 26)
- Re: multiple b0rkenness? Sean Donelan (Sep 26)
- Re: multiple b0rkenness? Patrick Greenwell (Sep 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: multiple b0rkenness? George William Herbert (Sep 26)
- RE: multiple b0rkenness? Scott Patterson (Sep 26)
- RE: multiple b0rkenness? Scott Patterson (Sep 26)
- RE: multiple b0rkenness? Scott Patterson (Sep 26)