nanog mailing list archives
Re: The wyrms and the law.
From: bmanning () vacation karoshi com
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 20:14:29 +0000 (UCT)
That would only apply if there was malicious intent.
Great. Just what we need, lawyers to determine intent. --bill "Visualize Whorld Peas" bonus points for quote attribution.
Current thread:
- The wyrms and the law. Roeland Meyer (Sep 25)
- Re: The wyrms and the law. Larry Diffey (Sep 25)
- Re: The wyrms and the law. bmanning (Sep 25)
- RE: The wyrms and the law. Vivien M. (Sep 25)
- Re: The wyrms and the law. Jim Mercer (Sep 25)
- Re: The wyrms and the law. Larry Diffey (Sep 25)
- Re: The wyrms and the law. bmanning (Sep 25)
- Re: The wyrms and the law. Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 25)
- Re: The wyrms and the law. bmanning (Sep 25)
- Re: The wyrms and the law. Terence (Sep 25)
- Re: The wyrms and the law. Larry Diffey (Sep 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: The wyrms and the law. Los, Ralph (Sep 25)
- RE: The wyrms and the law. Roeland Meyer (Sep 25)
- RE: The wyrms and the law. Roeland Meyer (Sep 25)
- Re: The wyrms and the law. ken lindahl (Sep 25)