nanog mailing list archives
Re: route-map match clause for existance of a BGP session?
From: Chris Woodfield <rekoil () semihuman com>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2001 13:33:11 -0400
Is there a reason why applying a custom route map to that peering session only won't work? If you have a "standard" route map, just duplicate it, rename it, and add the relevant match statement. -Chris On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 10:25:14AM -0700, Bulger, Tim wrote:
Sorry for the non-operational content, but looking for some Cisco advice. Does anyone happen to know a trick for a route map match clause that will only match if a BGP session is established with a given peer? The idea being to only redistribute a particular static route based on the availability of the peer through which the next hop of the static would be configured... Thanks in advance, Tim
Current thread:
- route-map match clause for existance of a BGP session? Bulger, Tim (Sep 20)
- Re: route-map match clause for existance of a BGP session? Chris Woodfield (Sep 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: route-map match clause for existance of a BGP session? Bulger, Tim (Sep 20)
- RE: route-map match clause for existance of a BGP session? Bulger, Tim (Sep 21)