nanog mailing list archives
Re: bgp md5 auth
From: Randy Bush <randy () psg com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2001 09:53:43 -0700
Two refused. One simply said they don't support. The other with reasoning that it was dumb and unnecessary with point-to-point links (ATM PVCs).
a bit light on the clue, eh?
Two organization said they don't support TCP MD5 authentication, but they'll do BGP password. Now when I ask I put a 'aka BGP password' in parentheses after I use the words 'TCP MD5 authentication'.
hey, they may never have seen more than one vendor in their lives, but at least they're trying.
The most common means of exchanging a password was over the phone. Second most common way was via PGP encrypted email. One organization sent a password in plain text email.
i'll settle randy
Current thread:
- RE: What Worked - What Didn't, (continued)
- RE: What Worked - What Didn't Randy Bush (Sep 17)
- RE: What Worked - What Didn't Iljitsch van Beijnum (Sep 17)
- RE: What Worked - What Didn't Roeland Meyer (Sep 17)
- RE: What Worked - What Didn't Roeland Meyer (Sep 17)
- Re: What Worked - What Didn't Jared Mauch (Sep 17)
- Re: What Worked - What Didn't Jeff Aitken (Sep 17)
- Re: What Worked - What Didn't John Kristoff (Sep 18)
- Re: What Worked - What Didn't Martin Cooper (Sep 17)
- bgp md5 auth Randy Bush (Sep 17)
- Re: bgp md5 auth John Kristoff (Sep 18)
- Re: bgp md5 auth Randy Bush (Sep 18)
- bgp md5 auth Randy Bush (Sep 17)