nanog mailing list archives
Re: Re[2]: NOC Question
From: Gregory Urban <urban () cs umbc edu>
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2001 13:05:01 -0600
At 12:36 AM 10/19/2001, you wrote:
I'd like to see how many folks have the top-end functional NOCs as opposed to fishbowls for customers to gawk at like a zoo. Low, indirect lighting. Sound and light absorbing materials everywhere. Quiet fans in the ceiling. Enough space between NOC techs so that phone conversations don't interfere with each other. etc. That's opposed to NOCs with white, hard, sound and light reflecting materials, bright flourscent lighting, closely packed people and the clear window to look in from the outside creating the fishbowl effect. It's hard to tell, but the AT&T NOC in the link given earlier seems to have the characteristics of the first kind, but the picture's not too detailed. Any good, detailed pictures of a top-end functional NOC with said characteristics? scott
Talk about a fishbowl, the AT&T NOC has an overlook area for customers complete with stadium seating!
Greg U
Current thread:
- NOC Question Kath (Oct 18)
- Re: NOC Question J.D. Falk (Oct 18)
- Re[2]: NOC Question Richard Welty (Oct 18)
- Network Tools Mike Hyde (Oct 18)
- Re: Network Tools Mike Hyde (Oct 18)
- Re: Re[2]: NOC Question scott w (Oct 18)
- Message not available
- Re: Re[2]: NOC Question Gregory Urban (Oct 30)
- Re[2]: NOC Question Richard Welty (Oct 18)
- Re: NOC Question J.D. Falk (Oct 18)
- Re: NOC Question Brian Whalen (Oct 19)
- Re: NOC Question Timothy Brown (Oct 19)
- Re: NOC Question Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 19)
- Re: NOC Question J.D. Falk (Oct 19)
- Re: NOC Question Greg Maxwell (Oct 19)
- Re: NOC Question mike harrison (Oct 19)
- Re: NOC Question Jim Popovitch (Oct 19)
- Re: NOC Question Andrew Brown (Oct 19)
- Re: NOC Question Mike Lewinski (Oct 19)