nanog mailing list archives
RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out
From: James Thomason <james () divide org>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 12:59:54 -0700 (PDT)
If I did, and they responded negatively, I would tell them YOU said it was a good idea. Seriously, why should the administrators of *.army.mil care if I test packet response time between our networks? Is this an illegal activity I am unaware of? On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Patrick W. Gilmore wrote:
At 02:16 PM 10/26/2001 -0500, Quibell, Marc wrote: > >Maybe you should ping NS01.ARMY.MIL about 2400 times in 3 hour and see if >you don't get a visit? Pinging a website 2 times means nothing.. How about 441 times in 2 hours? :) >Marc -- TTFN, patrick
Current thread:
- RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out Quibell, Marc (Oct 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out Patrick W. Gilmore (Oct 26)
- RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out James Thomason (Oct 26)
- Re: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out Owen DeLong (Oct 26)
- RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out James Thomason (Oct 26)
- RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out Quibell, Marc (Oct 26)
- RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out James Thomason (Oct 26)
- Re: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out Stephen Griffin (Oct 28)