nanog mailing list archives
RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out
From: James Thomason <james () divide org>
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 11:50:53 -0700 (PDT)
PING www.army.mil (140.183.234.10): 56 data bytes ^C --- www.army.mil ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 0 packets received, 100% packet loss Am I a terrorist now too? On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Dan Hollis wrote:
On Fri, 26 Oct 2001, Mike Batchelor wrote:<rant> Digital Island is certainly not alone in their practice of assuming an opt-in stance.I think you know that for an operation like Digital Island or Akamai, asking every network operator permission to probe is for all practical purposes, impossible. Insisting on opt-in is insisting on these companies going out of business, or not even starting up at all.I wonder if Digital Island "probes" .mil sites. -Dan -- [-] Omae no subete no kichi wa ore no mono da. [-]
Current thread:
- MIT network measurement probes David G. Andersen (Oct 25)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: MIT network measurement probes Christopher Wolff (Oct 25)
- Re: MIT network measurement probes David G. Andersen (Oct 25)
- [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out measl (Oct 25)
- RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out Mike Batchelor (Oct 26)
- RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out Dan Hollis (Oct 26)
- RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out James Thomason (Oct 26)
- RE: [SOT Rant] Non-hostile probes / opt-in/out mike harrison (Oct 26)